Liquor ban policy decision, court can’t take call: HC

HYDERABAD: An octogenarian couple from Jadcherla in Mahbubnagar have approached the Telangana excessive court docket urging it to direct the state to impose complete prohibition in Telangana.
They cited the incorrigible methods of their alcoholic son to drive house their level. “For the reason that liquor ban is a coverage choice, the choice must be taken by the state and never the court docket. It’s for the legislation makers to take a name within the matter,” the court docket mentioned and dismissed the PIL.

Liquor ban policy decision, court can’t take call: HC

The aged couple, S Ramachandraiah Goud and Bharathamma, had filed a petition in 2016. Their son, who’s working with the police division, had grow to be abusive and began ill-treating his spouse. She abandoned him after a while.
Now, he was abusing his mother and father. They wished their son to be despatched to a de-addiction centre they usually sought police safety to stop their son from resorting to violent assaults on them inebriated.
As is the case with all alcoholics, in all probability after believing the false assurances of their son, they didn’t pursue the matter after that. In April 2022, when the matter surfaced once more by itself, a single decide opined that the contents of the petition have been within the nature of a public curiosity plea and therefore directed the registry to acquire directions from the Chief Justice to transform the identical right into a PIL.
The writ petition was accordingly transformed right into a PIL, which got here up earlier than a bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili. In line with the couple’s counsel P V Krishnaiah, the state was the largest beneficiary of the liquor coverage, which has been getting most income.
Although there have been instructions from the courts to ascertain de-addiction centres all around the state to confess the addicts, no such preparations have been made. The state liquor coverage ought to change and it ought to shift in direction of complete prohibition, he mentioned.
“The previous mother and father’ rights are being violated and even the drunkard son’s life and his rights are additionally getting ruined within the course of. The state needs to be held accountable for the chaos which is exhibiting curiosity solely in income and never in society or public well being,” he mentioned.
The bench, nonetheless, mentioned that for the reason that liquor ban was a coverage choice, it must be taken by the state and never the court docket.

Supply hyperlink

By Samy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.